Add policy repository structure and initial governance documents
Publish Docs / publish-docs (push) Successful in 50s
Details
Publish Docs / publish-docs (push) Successful in 50s
Details
This commit is contained in:
parent
eddaac8287
commit
06c2b68b30
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,166 @@
|
|||
# Policy Repository
|
||||
|
||||
This directory contains the controlled policy, procedure, standard, guideline, form, exception, and evidence records for the Kell Creations platform.
|
||||
|
||||
## Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
The purpose of this repository structure is to provide a controlled, auditable, and maintainable lifecycle for business policies and supporting governance records.
|
||||
|
||||
This repository supports:
|
||||
|
||||
- document creation
|
||||
- review and approval
|
||||
- publication to active status
|
||||
- version control
|
||||
- retirement of superseded documents
|
||||
- retention of approval and retirement evidence
|
||||
|
||||
## Repository Structure
|
||||
|
||||
### `active/`
|
||||
Contains approved documents that are currently in force.
|
||||
|
||||
### `drafts/`
|
||||
Contains documents being authored or revised before formal review.
|
||||
|
||||
### `review/`
|
||||
Contains documents that are under formal review and awaiting approval, rejection, or revision.
|
||||
|
||||
### `retired/`
|
||||
Contains documents that are no longer active because they were superseded, withdrawn, or retired.
|
||||
|
||||
### `templates/`
|
||||
Contains approved starter templates for controlled documents.
|
||||
|
||||
### `register/`
|
||||
Contains the master document register and supporting control logs.
|
||||
|
||||
### `evidence/`
|
||||
Contains approval records, review records, exceptions, and retirement evidence.
|
||||
|
||||
## Lifecycle Model
|
||||
|
||||
Controlled documents move through the following lifecycle:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Draft
|
||||
2. Review
|
||||
3. Active
|
||||
4. Superseded or Revised
|
||||
5. Retired
|
||||
|
||||
Documents should not skip lifecycle stages without documented approval.
|
||||
|
||||
## Document Types
|
||||
|
||||
The following document types are supported:
|
||||
|
||||
- Policy
|
||||
- Procedure
|
||||
- Standard
|
||||
- Guideline
|
||||
- Form
|
||||
- Exception
|
||||
|
||||
## Naming Convention
|
||||
|
||||
Documents should follow this pattern:
|
||||
|
||||
`KC-<TYPE>-<DOMAIN>-<NUMBER>-<short-title>.md`
|
||||
|
||||
Examples:
|
||||
|
||||
- `KC-POL-GOV-001-document-control-policy.md`
|
||||
- `KC-PRO-GOV-001-policy-review-and-retirement-procedure.md`
|
||||
- `KC-STD-MKT-001-social-media-publishing-standard.md`
|
||||
|
||||
### Type codes
|
||||
|
||||
- `POL` = Policy
|
||||
- `PRO` = Procedure
|
||||
- `STD` = Standard
|
||||
- `GLD` = Guideline
|
||||
- `FRM` = Form
|
||||
- `EXC` = Exception
|
||||
|
||||
### Domain codes
|
||||
|
||||
- `GOV` = Governance
|
||||
- `OPS` = Operations
|
||||
- `ECM` = Ecommerce
|
||||
- `MKT` = Marketing
|
||||
- `MFG` = Manufacturing
|
||||
- `FIN` = Finance
|
||||
- `IT` = Information Technology
|
||||
- `SEC` = Security
|
||||
- `PRV` = Privacy
|
||||
|
||||
## Required Metadata
|
||||
|
||||
All controlled documents must begin with YAML front matter that includes:
|
||||
|
||||
- `document_id`
|
||||
- `title`
|
||||
- `document_type`
|
||||
- `domain`
|
||||
- `version`
|
||||
- `status`
|
||||
- `owner`
|
||||
- `reviewers`
|
||||
- `approver`
|
||||
- `effective_date`
|
||||
- `next_review_date`
|
||||
- `supersedes`
|
||||
- `related_documents`
|
||||
- `related_systems`
|
||||
- `retention_period`
|
||||
- `confidentiality`
|
||||
|
||||
## Document Control Rules
|
||||
|
||||
- All controlled documents must be stored in Git.
|
||||
- All changes must be reviewed through the approved repository workflow.
|
||||
- Active documents must have an approver and effective date.
|
||||
- Superseded documents must be moved to `retired/`.
|
||||
- Approval and retirement actions must be reflected in the control logs under `register/`.
|
||||
- Evidence of approval, review, exception, or retirement should be preserved under `evidence/`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Registers
|
||||
|
||||
### `policy-register.csv`
|
||||
The master index of controlled documents.
|
||||
|
||||
### `document-control-log.csv`
|
||||
The record of lifecycle changes and status transitions.
|
||||
|
||||
### `review-calendar.csv`
|
||||
The schedule for periodic policy review.
|
||||
|
||||
### `exception-register.csv`
|
||||
The record of approved and tracked exceptions.
|
||||
|
||||
## Recommended Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
1. Create a new document in `drafts/`.
|
||||
2. Assign owner, reviewers, and proposed approver.
|
||||
3. Move document to `review/` when ready for formal review.
|
||||
4. Approve and move to `active/` when authorized.
|
||||
5. Update the document register and control log.
|
||||
6. Move superseded versions to `retired/`.
|
||||
7. Store supporting approval or retirement evidence in `evidence/`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship to Architecture and Operations
|
||||
|
||||
This policy repository supports the architecture and workflow documentation maintained elsewhere in the repository, including:
|
||||
|
||||
- policy lifecycle workflows
|
||||
- audit and compliance architecture
|
||||
- CI/CD workflow documentation
|
||||
- operating procedures for controlled publication
|
||||
|
||||
## Ownership
|
||||
|
||||
Unless otherwise specified in a document, repository governance is owned by the Kell Creations business owner.
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
|
||||
This policy repository is the controlled governance layer for Kell Creations documentation, operational rules, and retained compliance evidence.
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,194 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
document_id: KC-POL-GOV-001
|
||||
title: Document Control Policy
|
||||
document_type: Policy
|
||||
domain: Governance
|
||||
version: 1.0
|
||||
status: Active
|
||||
owner: Business Owner
|
||||
reviewers:
|
||||
- Operations Staff
|
||||
approver: Business Owner
|
||||
effective_date: 2026-04-03
|
||||
next_review_date: 2027-04-03
|
||||
supersedes: None
|
||||
related_documents:
|
||||
- KC-PRO-GOV-001
|
||||
related_systems:
|
||||
- Kell Creations Platform
|
||||
- Policy Repository
|
||||
- Forgejo Git
|
||||
- Compliance Evidence Repository
|
||||
retention_period: 3 years
|
||||
confidentiality: Internal
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
The purpose of this policy is to establish a controlled and auditable process for creating, reviewing, approving, publishing, revising, superseding, retaining, and retiring official Kell Creations governance and operational documents.
|
||||
|
||||
# Scope
|
||||
|
||||
This policy applies to all controlled documents maintained within the Kell Creations repository structure, including:
|
||||
|
||||
- policies
|
||||
- procedures
|
||||
- standards
|
||||
- guidelines
|
||||
- forms
|
||||
- exception records
|
||||
|
||||
This policy applies to all business areas using the policy repository, including governance, operations, ecommerce, marketing, manufacturing, finance, information technology, security, and privacy.
|
||||
|
||||
# Policy Statement
|
||||
|
||||
Kell Creations shall maintain all controlled documents through a defined document lifecycle that supports traceability, version control, formal approval, and retention of evidence.
|
||||
|
||||
Controlled documents must be:
|
||||
|
||||
- uniquely identified
|
||||
- versioned
|
||||
- assigned an owner
|
||||
- reviewed before activation
|
||||
- approved before publication to active status
|
||||
- retained in version-controlled form
|
||||
- retired when superseded, obsolete, or withdrawn
|
||||
|
||||
No document shall be treated as active policy unless it is stored in the approved repository structure, has required metadata, and has been formally approved.
|
||||
|
||||
# Document Lifecycle Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
## Draft
|
||||
|
||||
A document begins in draft status while being authored or revised.
|
||||
|
||||
Draft documents must:
|
||||
|
||||
- use an approved template where applicable
|
||||
- include required metadata
|
||||
- identify an owner
|
||||
- be stored in the `drafts/` area unless formally advanced
|
||||
|
||||
## Review
|
||||
|
||||
A document moves to review status when the owner determines it is ready for formal evaluation.
|
||||
|
||||
Review documents must:
|
||||
|
||||
- identify reviewers
|
||||
- be evaluated for completeness, clarity, and applicability
|
||||
- remain unchanged except through controlled revision
|
||||
|
||||
## Active
|
||||
|
||||
A document becomes active only after formal approval by the named approver.
|
||||
|
||||
Active documents must:
|
||||
|
||||
- include an effective date
|
||||
- include a next review date
|
||||
- be stored in the `active/` area
|
||||
- be referenced in the document register
|
||||
|
||||
## Revision and Supersession
|
||||
|
||||
When an active document is changed materially, the revised version must proceed through draft and review before replacing the active version.
|
||||
|
||||
Superseded versions must not remain in the active area.
|
||||
|
||||
## Retirement
|
||||
|
||||
A document shall be retired when it is no longer needed, replaced, withdrawn, or no longer applicable.
|
||||
|
||||
Retired documents must:
|
||||
|
||||
- be moved to the `retired/` area
|
||||
- retain their historical metadata
|
||||
- be referenced in the control log
|
||||
- retain supporting retirement evidence when required
|
||||
|
||||
# Metadata Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
All controlled documents must include front matter with the required metadata fields defined in the repository guidance.
|
||||
|
||||
Missing or incomplete metadata makes a document ineligible for active status.
|
||||
|
||||
# Version Control Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
Controlled documents must be maintained in the Kell Creations Git repository.
|
||||
|
||||
All lifecycle changes must be traceable through version history and supporting control records.
|
||||
|
||||
Git history supports technical traceability, but document register and control log updates are still required for formal lifecycle accountability.
|
||||
|
||||
# Roles and Responsibilities
|
||||
|
||||
## Business Owner
|
||||
|
||||
The Business Owner shall:
|
||||
|
||||
- approve active policies and procedures unless delegated otherwise
|
||||
- ensure document control is enforced
|
||||
- review high-impact governance changes
|
||||
- approve retirement of major governing documents
|
||||
- ensure repository integrity and governance consistency
|
||||
|
||||
## Document Owner
|
||||
|
||||
The document owner shall:
|
||||
|
||||
- maintain document accuracy
|
||||
- initiate review when updates are needed
|
||||
- ensure metadata is complete
|
||||
- coordinate revisions and corrections
|
||||
- ensure the document is moved through the proper lifecycle state
|
||||
|
||||
## Reviewers
|
||||
|
||||
Reviewers shall:
|
||||
|
||||
- evaluate assigned documents for accuracy and applicability
|
||||
- provide timely feedback
|
||||
- identify conflicts, ambiguity, or missing controls
|
||||
|
||||
## Operations Staff
|
||||
|
||||
Operations Staff shall:
|
||||
|
||||
- use active documents as authoritative references
|
||||
- support document updates where assigned
|
||||
- avoid relying on draft or retired documents for active operations
|
||||
|
||||
# Document Registers and Evidence
|
||||
|
||||
The following records must be maintained:
|
||||
|
||||
- `policy-register.csv`
|
||||
- `document-control-log.csv`
|
||||
- `review-calendar.csv`
|
||||
- `exception-register.csv` when applicable
|
||||
|
||||
Approval, review, exception, and retirement evidence should be preserved under the `evidence/` structure when required by the document type or business need.
|
||||
|
||||
# Exceptions
|
||||
|
||||
Exceptions to this policy must be documented, justified, approved, time-bounded where appropriate, and recorded as controlled exception records.
|
||||
|
||||
No informal exception overrides this policy.
|
||||
|
||||
# Compliance and Enforcement
|
||||
|
||||
Failure to maintain document control may result in:
|
||||
|
||||
- use of outdated or unauthorized guidance
|
||||
- inconsistent business execution
|
||||
- loss of approval traceability
|
||||
- reduced audit readiness
|
||||
|
||||
Noncompliant documents may be withdrawn from active use until corrected.
|
||||
|
||||
# Review and Revision History
|
||||
|
||||
| Version | Date | Description | Author | Approver |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| 1.0 | 2026-04-03 | Initial active release | Business Owner | Business Owner |
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,192 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
document_id: KC-PRO-GOV-001
|
||||
title: Policy Review and Retirement Procedure
|
||||
document_type: Procedure
|
||||
domain: Governance
|
||||
version: 1.0
|
||||
status: Active
|
||||
owner: Business Owner
|
||||
reviewers:
|
||||
- Operations Staff
|
||||
approver: Business Owner
|
||||
effective_date: 2026-04-03
|
||||
next_review_date: 2027-04-03
|
||||
supersedes: None
|
||||
related_documents:
|
||||
- KC-POL-GOV-001
|
||||
related_systems:
|
||||
- Policy Repository
|
||||
- Forgejo Git
|
||||
- Compliance Evidence Repository
|
||||
retention_period: 3 years
|
||||
confidentiality: Internal
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
This procedure defines the steps used to review active controlled documents and to retire documents that are superseded, obsolete, or no longer applicable.
|
||||
|
||||
# Scope
|
||||
|
||||
This procedure applies to all controlled documents maintained under the Kell Creations policy repository structure.
|
||||
|
||||
# Preconditions
|
||||
|
||||
Before starting this procedure, the following should exist:
|
||||
|
||||
- the target document is identified
|
||||
- the current version is available in the repository
|
||||
- the owner and approver are known
|
||||
- supporting review or retirement rationale is available
|
||||
|
||||
# Procedure Steps
|
||||
|
||||
## A. Periodic Review Process
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Identify review candidate
|
||||
|
||||
Identify a document for review using one or more of the following:
|
||||
|
||||
- scheduled review date
|
||||
- business process change
|
||||
- system change
|
||||
- regulatory or governance update
|
||||
- issue discovered during operations
|
||||
- owner-requested review
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Confirm current document state
|
||||
|
||||
Verify:
|
||||
|
||||
- document ID
|
||||
- version
|
||||
- current status
|
||||
- owner
|
||||
- file location
|
||||
- related documents
|
||||
- next review date
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Evaluate the document
|
||||
|
||||
Review the document for:
|
||||
|
||||
- continued applicability
|
||||
- accuracy
|
||||
- clarity
|
||||
- completeness
|
||||
- consistency with current business practice
|
||||
- consistency with related architecture, systems, and workflows
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. Determine review outcome
|
||||
|
||||
Select one of the following outcomes:
|
||||
|
||||
- no change required
|
||||
- revise and resubmit
|
||||
- supersede with a new version
|
||||
- retire document
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Record review result
|
||||
|
||||
Update the appropriate records, including:
|
||||
|
||||
- `review-calendar.csv`
|
||||
- `document-control-log.csv`
|
||||
|
||||
If no change is required, update the next review date and close the review cycle.
|
||||
|
||||
## B. Revision and Supersession Process
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Create revised draft
|
||||
|
||||
If revision is required, create or update the next version in the appropriate `drafts/` area.
|
||||
|
||||
### 7. Route for review
|
||||
|
||||
Move or track the revised document through the `review/` state and gather reviewer input.
|
||||
|
||||
### 8. Obtain approval
|
||||
|
||||
Obtain formal approval from the named approver.
|
||||
|
||||
### 9. Publish revised version
|
||||
|
||||
After approval:
|
||||
|
||||
- place the approved document in the correct `active/` location
|
||||
- update version and effective date
|
||||
- update the document register
|
||||
- log the transition in the control log
|
||||
|
||||
### 10. Retire superseded version
|
||||
|
||||
Move the superseded active version to the appropriate `retired/` location and record the supersession in the control log.
|
||||
|
||||
## C. Retirement Process
|
||||
|
||||
### 11. Identify retirement basis
|
||||
|
||||
A document may be retired because it is:
|
||||
|
||||
- replaced by a newer version
|
||||
- no longer applicable
|
||||
- obsolete due to process or system change
|
||||
- withdrawn by management decision
|
||||
|
||||
### 12. Confirm retirement impact
|
||||
|
||||
Before retiring the document, confirm:
|
||||
|
||||
- no current dependency requires it to remain active
|
||||
- users can be directed to a replacement, if applicable
|
||||
- related records are updated
|
||||
- evidence of the retirement decision is captured when needed
|
||||
|
||||
### 13. Obtain retirement approval
|
||||
|
||||
The named approver must approve retirement before the document is removed from the active set.
|
||||
|
||||
### 14. Move document to retired state
|
||||
|
||||
Move the document to the matching path under `retired/`.
|
||||
|
||||
Do not delete retired controlled documents unless a separate retention rule explicitly authorizes deletion.
|
||||
|
||||
### 15. Update records
|
||||
|
||||
Update:
|
||||
|
||||
- `policy-register.csv`
|
||||
- `document-control-log.csv`
|
||||
- `review-calendar.csv` as applicable
|
||||
|
||||
### 16. Preserve evidence
|
||||
|
||||
Store supporting evidence in the appropriate evidence folder when required, including:
|
||||
|
||||
- approval note
|
||||
- review outcome
|
||||
- supersession reference
|
||||
- retirement rationale
|
||||
|
||||
# Outputs
|
||||
|
||||
This procedure should result in one or more of the following:
|
||||
|
||||
- updated active document
|
||||
- retired document
|
||||
- updated review date
|
||||
- updated registers and control log
|
||||
- retained approval or retirement evidence
|
||||
|
||||
# Exceptions and Escalation
|
||||
|
||||
If review cannot be completed on time, or if ownership, applicability, or replacement status is unclear, escalate to the Business Owner.
|
||||
|
||||
If an active document appears unsafe, misleading, or materially outdated, it should be flagged for immediate review and may be temporarily withheld from operational use pending decision.
|
||||
|
||||
# Review and Revision History
|
||||
|
||||
| Version | Date | Description | Author | Approver |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| 1.0 | 2026-04-03 | Initial active release | Business Owner | Business Owner |
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|||
timestamp,document_id,action,from_status,to_status,version,performed_by,approved_by,notes
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|||
exception_id,related_document_id,title,owner,approver,status,effective_date,expiration_date,notes
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|||
document_id,title,document_type,domain,version,status,owner,approver,effective_date,next_review_date,supersedes,file_path
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -0,0 +1 @@
|
|||
document_id,title,owner,current_version,status,next_review_date,review_cycle,notes
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
document_id: KC-EXC-XXX-001
|
||||
title: Exception Title
|
||||
document_type: Exception
|
||||
domain: Domain Name
|
||||
version: 0.1
|
||||
status: Draft
|
||||
owner: Business Owner
|
||||
reviewers:
|
||||
- Operations Staff
|
||||
approver: Business Owner
|
||||
effective_date: TBD
|
||||
next_review_date: TBD
|
||||
supersedes: None
|
||||
related_documents: []
|
||||
related_systems: []
|
||||
retention_period: 3 years
|
||||
confidentiality: Internal
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Exception Summary
|
||||
|
||||
Describe the requested exception.
|
||||
|
||||
# Related Policy or Standard
|
||||
|
||||
List the governing document and requirement being excepted.
|
||||
|
||||
# Business Justification
|
||||
|
||||
Explain why the exception is needed.
|
||||
|
||||
# Risk and Impact
|
||||
|
||||
Describe operational, financial, security, or compliance impact.
|
||||
|
||||
# Compensating Controls
|
||||
|
||||
List temporary or alternate controls.
|
||||
|
||||
# Approval
|
||||
|
||||
- Approver:
|
||||
- Decision:
|
||||
- Expiration Date:
|
||||
|
||||
# Review and Revision History
|
||||
|
||||
| Version | Date | Description | Author | Approver |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| 0.1 | TBD | Initial draft | TBD | TBD |
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
document_id: KC-FRM-XXX-001
|
||||
title: Form Title
|
||||
document_type: Form
|
||||
domain: Domain Name
|
||||
version: 0.1
|
||||
status: Draft
|
||||
owner: Business Owner
|
||||
reviewers:
|
||||
- Operations Staff
|
||||
approver: Business Owner
|
||||
effective_date: TBD
|
||||
next_review_date: TBD
|
||||
supersedes: None
|
||||
related_documents: []
|
||||
related_systems: []
|
||||
retention_period: 3 years
|
||||
confidentiality: Internal
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Form Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
Describe what this form captures.
|
||||
|
||||
# Form Fields
|
||||
|
||||
- Requester Name:
|
||||
- Date:
|
||||
- Document ID:
|
||||
- Reason:
|
||||
- Impact:
|
||||
- Requested Approval:
|
||||
- Approver Decision:
|
||||
- Approval Date:
|
||||
|
||||
# Usage Notes
|
||||
|
||||
Describe how to complete, approve, store, and retain this form.
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
document_id: KC-POL-XXX-001
|
||||
title: Policy Title
|
||||
document_type: Policy
|
||||
domain: Domain Name
|
||||
version: 0.1
|
||||
status: Draft
|
||||
owner: Business Owner
|
||||
reviewers:
|
||||
- Operations Staff
|
||||
approver: Business Owner
|
||||
effective_date: TBD
|
||||
next_review_date: TBD
|
||||
supersedes: None
|
||||
related_documents: []
|
||||
related_systems: []
|
||||
retention_period: 3 years
|
||||
confidentiality: Internal
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
State why this policy exists and what business objective it supports.
|
||||
|
||||
# Scope
|
||||
|
||||
Define what people, processes, systems, and records are covered.
|
||||
|
||||
# Policy Statement
|
||||
|
||||
State the governing rules, expectations, and required controls.
|
||||
|
||||
# Roles and Responsibilities
|
||||
|
||||
## Owner
|
||||
Define ownership responsibilities.
|
||||
|
||||
## Staff
|
||||
Define staff responsibilities.
|
||||
|
||||
## Approver
|
||||
Define approval authority.
|
||||
|
||||
# Compliance and Enforcement
|
||||
|
||||
Explain how compliance is expected, monitored, and enforced.
|
||||
|
||||
# Exceptions
|
||||
|
||||
State how exceptions are requested, approved, documented, and reviewed.
|
||||
|
||||
# Review and Revision History
|
||||
|
||||
| Version | Date | Description | Author | Approver |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| 0.1 | TBD | Initial draft | TBD | TBD |
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
document_id: KC-PRO-XXX-001
|
||||
title: Procedure Title
|
||||
document_type: Procedure
|
||||
domain: Domain Name
|
||||
version: 0.1
|
||||
status: Draft
|
||||
owner: Business Owner
|
||||
reviewers:
|
||||
- Operations Staff
|
||||
approver: Business Owner
|
||||
effective_date: TBD
|
||||
next_review_date: TBD
|
||||
supersedes: None
|
||||
related_documents: []
|
||||
related_systems: []
|
||||
retention_period: 3 years
|
||||
confidentiality: Internal
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
Describe the operational task this procedure supports.
|
||||
|
||||
# Scope
|
||||
|
||||
Define when and where this procedure applies.
|
||||
|
||||
# Preconditions
|
||||
|
||||
List prerequisites, inputs, or access requirements.
|
||||
|
||||
# Procedure Steps
|
||||
|
||||
1. Step one
|
||||
2. Step two
|
||||
3. Step three
|
||||
|
||||
# Outputs
|
||||
|
||||
List records, approvals, notifications, or resulting updates.
|
||||
|
||||
# Exceptions and Escalation
|
||||
|
||||
Describe what to do when the process cannot proceed normally.
|
||||
|
||||
# Review and Revision History
|
||||
|
||||
| Version | Date | Description | Author | Approver |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| 0.1 | TBD | Initial draft | TBD | TBD |
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
document_id: KC-STD-XXX-001
|
||||
title: Standard Title
|
||||
document_type: Standard
|
||||
domain: Domain Name
|
||||
version: 0.1
|
||||
status: Draft
|
||||
owner: Business Owner
|
||||
reviewers:
|
||||
- Operations Staff
|
||||
approver: Business Owner
|
||||
effective_date: TBD
|
||||
next_review_date: TBD
|
||||
supersedes: None
|
||||
related_documents: []
|
||||
related_systems: []
|
||||
retention_period: 3 years
|
||||
confidentiality: Internal
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
Define the control objective or consistency objective.
|
||||
|
||||
# Scope
|
||||
|
||||
State where this standard applies.
|
||||
|
||||
# Standard Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
- Requirement 1
|
||||
- Requirement 2
|
||||
- Requirement 3
|
||||
|
||||
# Measurement or Verification
|
||||
|
||||
Describe how conformance is checked.
|
||||
|
||||
# Exceptions
|
||||
|
||||
Describe how deviations are handled.
|
||||
|
||||
# Review and Revision History
|
||||
|
||||
| Version | Date | Description | Author | Approver |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
||||
| 0.1 | TBD | Initial draft | TBD | TBD |
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue